Rss

  • stumble
  • youtube
  • linkedin

Ex- IPS AND Ex-IAS officers open letter against religious intolerance and vigilantism

`HYPER-NATIONALISM WORRYING’

The appeal to the Centre has been prompted by a “deep sense of disquiet” at what has been happening in India

June 10, 2017We are a group of retired offi cers of All India and Central Services of different batches, who have worked with the Central and State Governments in the course of our careers. We should make it clear that as a group, we have no affi liation with any political party but believe in the credo of impartiality, neutrality and commitment to the Indian Constitution. A sense of deep disquiet at what has been happening in India has prompted us to write this open letter to chronicle our reservations and misgivings about recent developments in the body politic. What has gone wrong? It appears as if there is a growing climate of religious intolerance that is aimed primarily at Muslims. In Uttar Pradesh, in the run-up to the elections, an odious and frankly communal comparison was made between the relative number of burial grounds and cremation grounds. The question was also asked as to whether electricity was being supplied equally to different communities during their religious festivals. All this without any basis in fact or evidence. The banning of slaughter-houses targets the minorities and affects their livelihoods as well. Such intolerance breeds violence in a communally charged atmosphere even to the extent of a local leader in UP provoking an attack upon the residence of a Superintendent of Police, whose family was terrorized.

Vigilantism has become widespread. An Aklaq is killed on the basis of a suspicion that the meat he has is beef and a Pehlu Khan is lynched while transporting to his place two cows he had bought and for which he had the necessary papers. Nomadic shepherds are attacked in J and K on some suspicion as they practice their age-old occupation of moving from one place to another along with their cattle and belongings. Gaurakshaks function with impunity and seem to be doing so with the tacit complicity or active encouragement of State machinery. Punitive action against the perpetrators of violence does not take place promptly but cruelly, the victims have FIRs registered against them. The behaviour of vigilantes – who act as if they are prosecutor, judge and executioner rolled into one – flies in the face of law and jurisprudence. These actions undermine the rule of law and the Indian Constitution since only the State – through its various organs and institutions has the power to enforce the law. Vigilantism has become popular as ‘anti-Romeo’ squads threaten young couples who go out together, hold hands and are perhaps in love with each other. A thinly-veiled effort to prevent a Hindu-Muslim relationship or marriage, there is no justification in law to harass these couples, particularly when there is no complaint from the woman of being ill-treated. Student groups and faculty members on campuses like Hyderabad and JNU, who raise troubling questions about equality, social justice and freedom are subject to attack by the administration, with a supportive government to back them. In Jodhpur, a planned lecture by a renowned academic was cancelled under pressure and the faculty that organized the event subjected to disciplinary action. What happened in Jodhpur has happened at other institutions as well. Argumentation and discussion about different perspectives – the life-blood not only of institutions of learning but of democracy itself – are being throttled. Disagreement and dissent are considered seditious and anti-national. Such attitudes have a chilling impact on free speech and thought.

Several reputed NGOs and civil society organisations are being charged with violating the provisions of the FCRA and the Income Tax Act. While we agree that genuine violators should be identified and penalised, we note with dismay that several of the targeted groups are those who have taken stands against government policies, expressed dissent or supported communities in cases against the state.

munities in cases against the state. of of trolling, threats and online intimidation We are also seeing an ugly trend dominant intellectuals who disagree with the activists, journalists, writers and free speech?
ideology. How does this square with if that reduces any critique to a binary: There is a growing hyper-nationalism you are anti-national. Those in authority you are not with the government, is the clear message.should not be questioned ­ that majoritarianism, which do not authoritarianism and In the face of a rising and dissent, we appeal to all public allow for reasoned debate, discussion of public institutions and Constitutional bodies to take heed authorities, and corrective action. We have to reclaim these disturbing trends and take of India, as envisaged by the defend the spirit of the Constitution founding fathers.

Related posts

Comment (1)

  1. K SHESHU BABU

    The former administrative and police offivers appealing against the growing intolerance and vigilantism is a positive step. Their open letter should be considered immediately

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: