Rss

  • stumble
  • youtube
  • linkedin

NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals

 

NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals 2Editors Pick, Hospitals & Diagnostics, Medico Legal, State NewsSeptember 24, 2016 584 State : Tamil Nadu A+A- FacebookGoogleTwitterLinkedInEmailPrint Chennai: In a major move, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has overturned an order given by the Tamil Nadu state consumer commission, as per which the Apollo Hospital and its doctor were mandated to pay a fine of Rs. 23 Lakh to the parents of a a deceased patient on account of medical negligence

 

The case was that of a 12 year boy,R M Vijaram, who was admitted to Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai under the care of Dr Revathy Raj. The doctor diagnosed the patient as suffering from advanced stage leukemia and initiated chemotherapy on the patient. Soon after in December 16, 2008, the patient underwent a Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant at the hospital. Unfortunately, the patient didn’t survive long and died on April 17, 2009. The father of the patient approached the state commission alleging medical negligence on the part of the hospital.

 

Muthukrishnan, the father of the deceased alleged that the doctor compelled him to give consent for a bone marrow transplant on the boy. He further added that the doctors at the hospital did not perform any findings relating the possibility of a virus called cytomegalovirus in the early stage. The test, however, according to him was done at the later stage, after which infectious disease specialist from the hospital prescribed a medicine that was not even available with the hospital pharmacy.

Another allegation made against the doctor, was that he was travelling abroad from April 10th to April 17, 2009 , leaving the patient without proper care. The state consumer forum, after hearing, directed the doctor and the hospital, to pay a compensation of Rs 23 lakhs to the family of the deceased on account of medical negligence. The hospital soon approached the NCDRC challenging the said judgement .

The hospital in its statement said that soon after the boy was diagnosed with the disease the family of the patient was tested for matching stem cells but none of the family members’ stem cells matched with the patient. Thus the hospital carried a worldwide research for cord and marrow donors for six months which also failed as no match was found. After all these sequential efforts by the hospital high risk identical stem cell transplant was advised on the patient.

The Hon’ble court comprising  Justice AJIT BHARIHOKE and DR. S. M. KANTIKAR,   observed

 In the instant case, extensive search was made by OP for matching BMT but no matching donor was identified. Therefore, the expert opinion of Prof. Mammen Chandy from CMC Vellore was also sought for Haploidentical BMT. As per the medical literature, Haploidentical BMT is novel procedure where mismatch stem cells are treated with monoclonal anti bodies to prevent graft vs. host diseases – a dreaded complication of mismatch transplantation. The over all survival rate in the cases of Haploidentical. BMT is novel procedure where mismatch stem cells are treated with monoclonal anti bodies to prevent graft vs. host diseases – a dreaded complication of mismatch transplantation. The over all survival rate in the cases of Haploidentical BMT is 5 to 10 %. The death of the patient was due to number of known complications, which are consequences of BMT.

The court then set aside the order of the state commission and dismissed the case stating  “In our considered view, there was no medical negligence either in the procedure of BMT or in the care during post BMT complication “ You can read the full judgement below

Read more at Medical Dialogues: NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals http://medicaldialogues.in/ncdrc-overturnes-rs-23-lakh-medical-negligence-order-on-apollo-hospitals/

Related posts

Comment (1)

  1. K SHESHU BABU

    This verdict should serve as a guide to future cases of negligence of doctors and complications arising from treatment of abnormal diseases and procedure for deciding under what conditions, a case be treated as medical negligence.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: