Rss

  • stumble
  • youtube
  • linkedin

Radia Tapes, Ratan Tata’s Privacy, Fundamental Rights And Public Interest

Privacy is a sacrosanct right that any civilized society must recognise. However, we have no dedicated privacy rights and laws in India. This is despite the fact that privacy laws in India and privacy rights in India have been constantly demanded in India by various civil liberty stakeholders. Even we have no dedicated data protection laws in India as on date.

This is bizarre as in the present information and communication technology (ICT) era absence of privacy and data protection laws in India are more by design than ignorance. Techno legal experts in India have been suggesting that we must give a special attention to the privacy rights in India in the information age.

They maintain that privacy and data protection requirements are essential part of civil liberties protection in cyberspace. It would not be wrong to assume privacy and data protection rights as integral part of human rights protection in cyberspace.

Fortunately, privacy rights issue is pending before the Supreme Court of India due to leakage of tapped conversation between Ratan Tata and Nira Radia. The Supreme Court of India must expand privacy rights in India as that is the need of hour. However, while respecting the privacy rights of Ratan Tata we cannot exclude the right of others to information. Clearly, there is a conflict between right to privacy and right to information that needs to be resolved by the Indian Supreme Court.

According to Praveen Dalal, leading techno legal expert of Asia and managing partner of ICT law firm Perry4Law, “The Indian Constitutional Scheme is based upon “Balance of Rights” and no right is absolute in nature. In case of conflict between two Fundamental Rights, the Fundamental Right that strengthens and substantiate the Public Interest should prevail”. Hence if there is a conflict between Right to Privacy and Right to Information/know, information can be disclosed in certain circumstances to substantiate and strengthen Public Interest, opines Dalal.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of India has warned that privacy violations may also pose national security problems in India. The court has asked Indian government to keep in place a system that can maintain the safety and privacy of any intercepted and tapped conversation. Let us see what would be the stand of Centre in this regard during the next hearing.

source- http://cjnewsind.blogspot.in/2012/09/radia-tapes-ratan-tatas-privacy.html

Related posts

Comments (6)

  1. Well the talks which radia had with a host of people were not private as there were many talks where public interest is greater than private interest. And would Supreme Court have even accepted and heard a petition like this if it was not Ratan Tata who was the petitioner. No common man has the money and time to go for costly litigations, god knows whether its the Tata Group Companies or Ratan Tata himself who are paying the lawyers like Harish Salve and Mukul Rohtagi who charge a bomb for one hearing.

  2. Well the talks which radia had with a host of people were not private as there were many talks where public interest is greater than private interest. And would Supreme Court have even accepted and heard a petition like this if it was not Ratan Tata who was the petitioner. No common man has the money and time to go for costly litigations, god knows whether its the Tata Group Companies or Ratan Tata himself who are paying the lawyers like Harish Salve and Mukul Rohtagi who charge a bomb for one hearing.

  3. Hi! Thanks for the friend request, Nice to meet you .

  4. Hi! Thanks for the friend request, Nice to meet you .

  5. Thanks for covering our story.

    There are many more crucial aspects that are attached to this story. These are:

    (1) Post censorship- This news item was censored by Google. Kindly see http://tlnind.blogspot.com/2012/09/radia-tapes-news-censorship-updates-06.html in this regard.

    (2) Second story- We again covered this story with more material. The same is available at http://cjnewsind.blogspot.com/2012/09/national-security-privacy-rights-and.html

    (3) Constitutional experts- See opinion of constitutional experts at http://hrpic.blogspot.com/2012/09/national-security-and-right-to-information-in-india.html

    Clearly the public interest in this case is much more that the limited right to privacy of parties. Let us hope the supreme court of India would do justice to our informational rights.

  6. Thanks for covering our story.

    There are many more crucial aspects that are attached to this story. These are:

    (1) Post censorship- This news item was censored by Google. Kindly see http://tlnind.blogspot.com/2012/09/radia-tapes-news-censorship-updates-06.html in this regard.

    (2) Second story- We again covered this story with more material. The same is available at http://cjnewsind.blogspot.com/2012/09/national-security-privacy-rights-and.html

    (3) Constitutional experts- See opinion of constitutional experts at http://hrpic.blogspot.com/2012/09/national-security-and-right-to-information-in-india.html

    Clearly the public interest in this case is much more that the limited right to privacy of parties. Let us hope the supreme court of India would do justice to our informational rights.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: