Senior advocate and rights activist Indira Jaising on Tuesday accused the Madhya Pradesh Government of vendetta after she was denied permission to attend the inaugural session of a workshop at the National Law Institute University (NLIU) in Bhopal, for which she had already reached the cit
#WTFnews" data-image-description="<h3><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>It is very unfortunate that a most corrupt person like Ketan Desai who has amassed wealth illegally is escaping from the CBI net.</strong></span></h3> <p> </p> <p><img src="http://static.ibnlive.com/pix/sitepix/05_2010/mci_ketan_desai_630.jpg" alt="" width="630" height="420" /></p> <div id="plusone3"><a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/columnist/rahul_tripathi/">Rahul Tripathi</a> : New Delhi, Sat Jul 21 2012, New Indian Express</div> <p>The CBI on Friday closed the disproportionate assets case against former Medical Council of India (MCI) chairman Ketan Desai and his family, saying it did not have enough evidence to prosecute them.</p> <p>This is the second high-profile case the CBI has closed in recent days, the first one being the disproportionate assets case against former Dental Council of India chief Anil Kohli.</p> <p>The CBI raided Desai in April 2010 and allegedly caught him taking a Rs 2-crore bribe to grant recognition to a private medical college in Punjab. Desai’s arrest, along with that of J P Singh and Kanwaljit Singh of the medical college, and the subsequent probe highlighted deep-rooted corruption in MCI. The CBI received as many as 160 complaints of alleged violations by medical colleges that were overlooked by MCI.</p> <p>The CBI then probed about two dozen colleges across India and chargesheeted former health minister Anbumani Ramadoss for granting illegal favours to a college in Indore.</p> <p>In its closure report, filed in a Delhi court, the CBI claimed there was “insufficient evidence” to prosecute Desai, his wife and mother as it had not been able to link his assets to unknown sources of income.</p> <p>The CBI had booked Desai after allegedly finding “illegal assets” worth Rs 24 crore during raids at his properties in Delhi and Ahmedabad.</p> <p>The agency claimed Desai and his family had Rs 1.8 crore in bank deposits and owned several properties in Mumbai and Gujarat, five vehicles and gold and diamonds worth Rs 38 lakh.</p> <p>The CBI then summoned Desai to explain the sources of income and assets owned by him and his family. But after a two-year-long probe, the agency concluded that “the allegations could not be substantiated”</p> " data-medium-file="" data-large-file="" class="size-full wp-image-5764" src="http://i0.wp.com/184.108.40.206/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/2015_7img06_Jul_2015_PTI7_6_2015_000202A.jpg?resize=1160%2C773" alt="Mahila Congress activists burning an effigy of MP CM Shivraj Chouhan, demanding a CBI probe for his alleged involvement in the Vyapam scam. Credit: PTI Photo" width="753" height="501" />
Jaising, who is also the former Additional Solicitor General, had reached Bhopal on an invitation to attend the two-day workshop on “Gender sensitization and capacity building training on sexual harassment of women at work places”, which had been jointly organized by UN Women, the government of Madhya Pradesh and the NGO Lawyers Collective and NLIU.
When Jaising reached the University for the session at 10-30 a.m., the organizers prevented her from going inside, saying the State Government has not provided the “clearances on her name” for the event. At this, she left the venue, but not before making her displeasure known.
“I think it is because of my appearance in Vyapam,” she told The Wire. The meeting went ahead as scheduled.
Talking to the local media, Jaising said, “I condemn this attitude as an attack on the right of clients to legal representation”. She said though the Lawyers Collective, of which she was a trustee, appreciates the efforts of the State Government in spreading awareness of the law, the refusal to allow her to speak the was linked to her appearing for the petitioners.
The organizers defended their actions claiming it was only a “matter of coordination”. Dr Raka Arya, chairman of Gender and Health Loss at NLIU, was quoted as saying that “there was a delay in communication, nothing else.” There was no clarification about what this communication was. Nor were the organizers or the government forthcoming on why Jaising was stopped from entering an event that had no connection with the Vyapam issue.
The senior advocate is representing the petitioners – including former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Digvijay Singh — in the Vyapam scam in both the High Court and Supreme Court. She has been appearing in the case along with other senior advocates like KTS Tulsi, Vivek Thanka, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Kapil Sibal. She described the decision as a government backlash for her stand in the matter.