Maria, a street dweller in Bengaluru, Karnataka’s cosmopolitan capital, has been shifting from one footpath to another for the last decade and she is glad that she is not on her own. In her twenties, Maria came here from Tamil Nadu with her husband and child looking for a better source of livelihood because the family had no land back home. But being homeless in the city has proved far more of a nightmare than she had ever imagined. “Since we can’t afford rented housing, the men take turns keeping a vigil since women face the constant risk of physical and sexual abuse. My children study in a school run by the state government and we cook on the footpath. Taking a bath every day is not possible as we have to pay to use public toilets and bathrooms. There are some shelters run by the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP, or the Bengaluru Municipality) but we cannot live there as a family. Also, these facilities are far away from our workplace, making commuting difficult and expensive,” she elaborates.
If landlessness forced Maria and her family into a life on the city’s pavements, what compelled Hasnath, a native of Raichur – an arid and economically backward district in northern Karnataka – to migrate? Unsurprisingly, again it was landlessness that pushed her out of the relative comfort of the countryside into the crowded city. For a few months every year, she comes to work on construction sites getting weekly earnings of Rs 900 after toiling eight hours daily, six days a week. She lives amidst the dust and rubble of the construction site, sharing a small living space with her husband, a teenage daughter and other male and female workers.
Like scores of women, both Maria and Hasnath have hardly any idea of government schemes like the Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY), the Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) or the Bhoo Odethana Yojane, among others, that could help them gain a small foothold in the city or ensure modest homesteads back home. While the Indira Awas Yojana and Rajiv Awas Yojana are pan-Indian central government schemes initiated in 1985 and 2011, respectively to ensure housing for the homeless rural and urban poor, the Bhoo Odethana Yojane is a Karnataka state scheme introduced in 1992. Incidentally, both the central schemes leave out women from their purview by not explicitly granting property ownership rights to them.
What does such systemic omission mean for them? Today with only 12 per cent of rural Indian women own land – and the numbers are even smaller in urban areas – the fear of being rendered homeless is an all-pervading one. Women even put up with sustained violence in order to give their children a ‘peaceful’ existence. Saroja’s experience typifies that of innumerable women living on the streets. A 44-year-old domestic worker, she lives in a small rented accommodation in a low-income Bengaluru neighbourhood with her alcoholic husband and three children. “My husband used to work as a mason but now he refuses to do anything claiming that he is too old and ill to work. Sometimes I get so fed up, I threaten to leave him, but then he turns on me and says that I would have to pay him for the Rs 30,000 he gave as advance for the 10-month rental lease on our home. How can I even afford to part ways with him? Also, when the landlord threatens to raise the rent or evict us, which is quite often, at least he can tackle him, what can a lone woman like me do in such circumstances?” she asks.
While the odds are heavily against women owning land, a campaign launched by Landesa, a non-profit organisation that advocates for the land rights for women across different states in India, has helped to raise awareness about the issue. Since 2013, it has been studying women gaining their entitlements under the Bhoo Odethana Yojane (BOY), a land purchase and allocation scheme that is implemented by the Scheduled Caste (SC)/Scheduled Tribes (ST) Development Corporation of Karnataka for the benefit of women agricultural labourers, chiefly Dalits or Adivasis. According to the rules, the SC/ST Corporation provides 50 per cent subsidy and 50 per cent loan for the purchase of two acres of dry land or one acre of wet land for each beneficiary at a unit cost of Rs 5 lakh. The period of repayment of the loan amount is 10 years at an interest rate of six per cent. The scheme stipulates that the seller of the land must not be a Dalit or Adivasi.
Explains Lokesh S., State Director, Landesa Karnataka, “When we went to Nagathi Belagal village in Bhadravati taluk of Shimoga district in 2013, we discovered that none of the women had rights to any kind of land originally. Further, they had been unaware of schemes such as BOY or IAY. Therefore, we decided to understand how women and men got the requisite information about what their rights and entitlements. For this we met with the officers at various levels of government and the Gram Panchayat and learnt that the local government officers/representatives assisted the women in availing the relevant benefits by helping them complete the necessary procedures like the submission of caste certificates and the obtaining of land titles.”
Among the beneficiaries of this process in Shimoga district is 38-year-old Lakshmi. A Dalit landless labourer, she came to know about the BOY scheme from a local leader. After she got her name on the list she managed to purchase an acre of land, with the government putting in 50 per cent of the total cost of Rs 2,40,000. Lakshmi has already paid up Rs 60,000 of this in easy installments. That was the amount she had saved from the time she got married to Harlappa. Today, she is paying out the remainder of the amount from the money she earns by selling the agricultural produce cultivated on the land. While Lakshmi and Harlappa grow paddy, some of the other women beneficiaries have started growing vegetables as well.
The ownership of the land has brought a new sense of confidence to Lakshmi and others but it obviously took sustained effort by the government and Panchyat members over many years to overcome the initial skepticism of the villagers and ensure this positive outcome. Landesa’s study report and persistent advocacy has been vital to ensuring that the government recognises and replicates its successes.
The point to be noted here, however, is that joint property ownership does not guarantee any security for women, as often it is the male members who end up calling the shots. In traditional societies, people still believe that men must be responsible for all assets as women cannot be capable of properly managing them. Even when women own land independently, or with other women, as in some matrilineal societies, there might be ego clashes with the spouse, father, brother, uncles or other men in their marital family.
Land ownership is key to social transformation in rural India, and a roof over one’s head essential in urban settings. But to ensure that women too can work towards achieving this is an extremely difficult process. Despite this, as the Shimoga experience has shown, small steps taken in the right direction can lead to new pathways of life.
The names of some of the women quoted have been changed to protect their identity.
– See more at: http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tbp/indian-women-landless-village-homeless-city-100031960.html#sthash.lxKssPpI.dpuf
Leave a Reply