The govt has in place regulations that systematically calculate less than the payable compensation

Nitin Sethi & Sahil Makkar  |  New Delhi May 3, 2017 Last Updated at 01:15 IST

Rural, MGNREGA, Employment
The Union government has been understating the that workers should get under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) for the delay in payment of Not just that, only a portion of this understated is being paid to the beneficiaries across the country.

According to the job guarantee scheme, should be paid to workers within 15 days of generation of the muster roll.

If that is not done, then the workers need to be paid for each day of delay till the are deposited into their accounts.

However, the government has in place regulations that systematically calculate less than the payable These rules require the government to calculate the only till the date a demand is raised at the district level by officials for payment of (called a fund transfer order, or ), and not till the actual payment of to the worker.


An is generated at the state level as a demand to the Centre for transferring the The actual transfer of funds happens much later — normally within a week after the generation — from the Union rural development ministry to the worker’s account, electronically.

Government records show that Rs 441 crore worth of (calculated using the method that understates the amount) was due to workers for delayed in financial year 2016-17. Out of this, the government approved of only Rs 17.15 crore and has paid Rs 10.70 crore so far.

For April 2017, worth Rs 6.31 lakh stood payable on May 1, against delayed of Rs 52.80 crore. But the state-level authorities, empowered by the rules of the Centre, have so far paid only Rs 1,734 across the country. “We are working to correct it. We should be able to fix this in future,” a senior officer in the ministry of rural development said, responding to questions.

“Currently, 44 per cent of transactions are happening on time. We are trying to improve it further by integrating the MIS system with the help of Public Financial Management System (PFMS) and National Informatics Centre. The part-1 (the time taken in generating muster roll and pushing the to Centre) and part 2 (the time taken by the Centre to process the and directly transfer the amount to the beneficiary’s account) would both be considered (for calculation of compensation),” the officer said.

The officer, however, noted that delay was largely occurring at the state level and not in payment from the Centre, adding the government was working hard to get states to pay on time.

The issue of is important because a large percentage of is not paid within the stipulated time. In 2016-17, Rs 19,455 crore worth of were paid after the stipulated 15 days. This is 55.86% of the total paid in the last financial year, according to a government affidavit presented to the Supreme Court. Business Standardreviewed the affidavit. Of these delayed wages, Rs 3,836 crore was paid after more than three months and Rs 2,578 crore after two months.

The Supreme Court in its recent orders asked the government to inform it about the status of both the paid for delayed and the interest paid on delayed

Rural development ministry regulations provide room for the states to reject even the understated In its annual master circular, it said last year that could be denied to workers for three reasons –natural calamity, lack of funds, and not due. However, neither the rural employment guarantee law nor its schedules have provisions for denying

The circular was revised this financial year to remove the “lack of funds” as an excuse to deny compensation, but in the computerised system states continue to use that as a reason to deny The other two reasons can still be exercised by states to deny the payable.

Speaking to Business Standard, the ministry officials admitted that giving reasons such as “lack of funds” to deny was not correct. But, last year itself, Rs 257 crore was denied to wage workers solely on this ground.

The problems of systematically understating and then using various means to underpay even against these calculations have been pointed out earlier in the Central Employment Gaurantee Council of – the statutory apex body under the law to monitor the implementation of the scheme.
The minutes of the November 2016 meeting of the council show that a member pointed out that the ministry’s regulations and methods of calculating were a “violation of the act”.

The biggest challenge, officials admit off the record, in paying proper to the workers is the fact that state governments are required to recover the amount from functionaries responsible for the delay in paying in the first place.

The ministry keeps no record of how much has been collected from the officials and if any amount was recovered from central government officials for delay in paying the even after the was generated.