A view of the Margao wholesale fish market. With notebandi, distress sales, market closures and anchoring of fishing fleets have been reported from West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala.
Siolim, Mapusa, Panaji and Margao (Goa): Gangu Kundaikar is a small-framed, saree-clad woman who rises at 3 am every day, wraps a cloth around her waist so fish do not soil her saree, and takes a rented tempo to the Malim jetty in Panaji, North Goa, 8 km from her village, here in one of India’s most prosperous and literate states.
Kundaikar, 50, brings her day’s supply of fish back home to her village, Chimbel, to sell. Kundaikar, who studied up to class 10, has no bank account and a phone without an Internet connection. She is the only earner in her family of three, which includes her ageing mother and unemployed son.
Gangu Kundaikar, a small fish seller from Chimbel in North Goa, has been hit hard by notebandi. Her sales have halved since the ban on Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes, and she is barely making enough to keep her family of three fed.
Kundaikar bought fish worth Rs 3,000 to Rs 4,000 every day and kept the unsold catch in her refrigerator–her only asset. She worked through most of the day and barely made enough to keep her family fed.
That was before midnight on November 8, 2016, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government scrapped 86% of India’s bank notes, by value. Since then, Kundaikar has struggled to balance her family’s budget: Demand for fish has fallen and sales have dropped by 30%. “We are poor, hard-working people,” she told IndiaSpend. “Because of this move by the government, it has become hard for us.”
After China, India is the world’s second-largest producer of fish, but it is a perishable commodity, and less than 19% of fishing centres nationwide have infrastructure that allows fish to be processed or stored: Less than 23% of fishing villages have Internet access, and the fishing economy depends on cash. Profit margins vary according to the species sold, varying from 3.5% (medium-priced fish) to about 10% (high-priced fish) to 20% (low-priced fish), according to this 2012 research paper.
So merchant charges by banks–of 2-2.5% (on credit cards), 0.75-1% (on debit cards)–and even the 1% fee charged by Paytm, a digital wallet, is largely unaffordable, even if fishing villages had good Internet access, which they do usually do not.
Source: Marine Fisheries Census 2010
With notebandi–as the scrapping of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes is colloquially called–stories like Kundaikar’s have become common in fishing communities nationwide. Distress sales, market closures and anchoring of fishing fleets have been reported from West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala. A particular hammer blow appears to have been dealt by the new Rs 2,000 note because there is no change to return.
The crisis of 14.5 million Indians–more than the population of Greece or Portugal–dependent on fishing has crippled an industry that generates almost 1.1% to India’s gross domestic product (GDP). A quarter of these people work along 8,118 km of India’s coastline and 10 million along 197,024 km of inland waterways.
Most of these 14.5 million are part of India’s informal sector, unorganised workers, who constitute 82% of India’s 500-million-strong workforce–more than the combined populations of the USA, Germany and South Africa–and generate half of national GDP. Their world, as we found, changed almost overnight.
Ground reality: Over 50% loss in business, anger at government
Of the 20 fish sellers that IndiaSpend surveyed at a government-run market in Margao, south Goa, more than 80% reported buying less fish from wholesalers because demand was low, while 75% reported income-losses of half or more over the past month.
Our survey also showed that 30% of women did not have a bank account and that 55% did not use phones. Of the ones that did, only 33% had internet on their phone, which they did not use for banking.
Source: IndiaSpend survey
Small-scale fish retailers earn between Rs 3,000 and Rs 4,000 every day, IndiaSpendfound. If they were to use Paytm for transactions, they would be paying 1% charge to withdraw their money, which is Rs 30-40. For a daily profit of Rs 350-400, they said, this is unaffordable.
Source: IndiaSpend survey
The table above makes it clear that cashless transactions are not an immediate option, so the losses will continue. In any case, most have no Internet on their phone and hardly use their bank accounts, said Shashikala Govekar, president of the Fish Vendors Association at the Mapusa market.
Shashikala Govekar, president of the Fish Vendors Association in Mapusa, Goa has no Internet on her phone, and has not used her ATM card despite having one. “Most of us are illiterate. How will we use swipe machines,” she responded to the government’s cashless urgings.
We found a cascading effect of such losses. Before November 8, 2016, fish sellers got Rs 280 to Rs 300 per kg of mackerel (bangda), which is now down by about 35% to Rs 180 to Rs 200 per kg, according to members of the All Goa Wholesale Fish Market Association. The Margao Wholesale market is the only wholesale market in Goa, where catch from the neighbouring states of Maharashtra and Karnataka is also sold. Vehicles carrying fish from outside the state have fallen by a third.
Unless frozen, fresh fish must be thrown away, if not sold within two days: 67% of fishconsumed in India is fresh; no more than 23% is processed (dried, frozen or canned).
Neither fish markets nor landing centres (harbours where fishermen land their craft) have cold storages. Post-harvest fishing losses due to lack of infrastructure (for landing and berthing vessels) and domestic marketing are estimated to be as high as 20%, according to this 2011 report of the erstwhile Planning Commission. These losses are exacerbated by the current market slump.
By 2012, less than 19% of India’s fishing centres (256 of 1,376) were “developed”, which meant they had adequate landing and berthing infrastructure, and fish preservation & storage infrastructure. There are onshore facilities for a third or less of India’s marine fishing vehicles, said the report. With a large part of the industry informal and beyond the government’s purview, fisher folk are devising extra-legal ways to survive #notebandi.
The case of the Rs 500 note: Still legal tender at fish stalls
By 11 am on a sunny day in Siolim, North Goa, half of Deepali Govekar’s sales were in Rs 500 notes, which are, of course, outlawed.
Govekar runs Dilip Sea Food, a makeshift stall supported by wood and crates, that she rents for Rs 80 per day. Govekar sold jumbo prawns, squid, red snapper, and Indian salmon (rawas) to James D’Souza, who buys fish here every day for his restaurant in Mandrem, North Goa. “We are forced to give, and they are forced to take,” said D’Souza, referring to the seven Rs 500 old notes he had given Govekar. “We have to take, otherwise the fish will rot,” Govekar said. “I will give them to the tempo that brought the fish as payment, and he can use it for diesel at the petrol pump.”
This circulation of notes from customers to retailers to wholesalers to transporters/trawlers was underway until December 2, 2016–the last day that petrol pumps were accepting old notes.
Small-time fish sellers who had bank accounts were accepting Rs 500 notes even after December 2, 2016, and were depositing them because no one outside the fish market was accepting them. But if they refused these notes, they lost out on customers and were left with rotten fish the next day, because they had no change for the new Rs 2,000 note.
All but one of the 20 retailers we surveyed at the Margao market said they did not have change for customers, and this was why they were accepting Rs 500 notes, as of December 7, 2016.
A view of the South Goa Planning and Development Authority fish market at Margao. Of the 20 fish sellers that IndiaSpend surveyed at the market, more than 80% reported buying less fish from wholesalers because demand was low, while 75% reported income-losses of half or more over the past month.
“Why did the government not introduce the new Rs. 500 note first?” asked a Margao fish seller who requested anonymity. “This difference between the Rs 100 and the Rs 2,000 note is too large. Our business is suffering terribly.”
Can Goa really go cashless? Even the Chief Minister does not think so
On November 25, 2016, 16 days after the demonetisation announcement, the Indian Expressreported Defence Minister and erstwhile Goa Chief Minister (CM) Manohar Parrikar saying that Goa would become India’s first cashless state by December 30, 2016.
“Goans are using cards (ATM/credit) in a big way,” Parrikar was quoted as saying at a public meeting near Panjim. “Goa will soon be the first state with cashless society fulfilling a dream of the Prime Minister.”
On December 7, 2016, after his party and the opposition reflected the resentment across Goa, CM Laxmikant Parsekar said that there would be no deadline for Goa to go cashless. “There cannot be a deadline to go cashless,” said Parsekar. “I have always said that it is not cashless, but could be less cash to start with. Goa can do it.”
A major reason that India is unprepared for a cashless economy is a lack of connectivity. At least 73% of Indians (912 million people) do not have access to the internet, IndiaSpendreported on December 3, 2016.
Within 3,237 marine fishing villages in nine of India’s coastal states, 91% villages had mobile phone coverage, but barely 23% had access to the Internet.
Source: Marine Fisheries Census 2010
Fishing is predominantly a cash-based economy. Diesel used for trawlers and transport, renting of stall space at markets, labour and buying ice and payment for fish (whether by retailers or customers) is done by cash or credit.
Ashok Lamane, who sells fish to several restaurants near Morjim, said the credit component of his transactions increased manifold since November 8, 2016. “I am owed at least Rs 180,000 by the restaurants and, in turn, I owe money to the trawler owners,” he said.
Similarly, at the Margao wholesale market, the use of credit is rising. “Earlier, too, the market worked on credit–around 50% of all transactions–but now, this has increased to 80%,” said Sridhar Pujari, a wholesaler. “And while earlier, the payments would come in two to three days, now it is taking people eight to 10 days to return the cash.” Pujari pays for fish stock by cheque, but said it is “impossible” for the business to go cashless.
Rajashree Sawant travels 45 minutes by bus every day to sell fish at a Goan municipal market. She is there from 10 am to 7 pm. Her sales have fallen from Rs 1,000 a day to Rs 200 after notebandi. “Modi said ‘Garibi Hatao, Garibi hatao, (eradicate poverty)’, and now he is the one pushing us into poverty with this move,” she said.
One reason is the nature of the business itself. Since fish does not last long, retailers buy on credit and then repay wholesalers after they have sold their stock. Another reason is that daily wage labourers, such as fish-cleaners, ice-carriers and crate-carriers, don’t have bank accounts and want to be paid daily in cash.
Back in Mapusa, Shashikala Govekar–she has no Internet on her phone, and has not used her ATM card despite having one–offered her response to Modi’s cashless urgings.
“Seventy percent of people dealing with fish, whether wholesale or retail, are illiterate,” she said. “We don’t even know how to use smart phones, how will we operate swipe machines? We make a profit maybe once in four days and have 12 other kinds of trouble without having to add these machines to the list. Besides, the wholesale markets run from 3 am to 6 am, and it is dark. While handling fish, how will we swipe and sell?”
For our continuing coverage of #notebandi see Currency Chaos.
(Patil is an analyst with IndiaSpend. Video produced in partnership with Video Volunteers, a global initiative that empowers disadvantaged communities with story and data-gathering skills, and trains them to use video as a tool to mobilise for change.)
We welcome feedback. Please write to [email protected]. We reserve the right to edit responses for language and grammar.
December 22, 2016 at 4:00 pm
The article clearly reflects the difficulties of fishing communities in the wake of note ban. The lower sections are most affected people due to the policy especially in the coastal fishing dominated areas of the south India.