Ex-CJI RM Lodha condemns killings over cow protection, inter-religious marriage
On violence in the name of inter-religious marriages, he asked: “Should religion be a factor when two adults fall in love?”
Former Chief Justice of India R M Lodha. (Source: Express file photo)
Expressing concern over the growing incidents of human rights violation, former Chief Justice of India R M Lodha said people have been slaughtered in the name of cow protection, couple have been murdered in the name of love jihad, artists have been threatened to be beheaded for their creativity, activists have been booked on the charge of sedition and the culprits are yet to be brought to book.
Speaking on the occasion of Human Rights Day, Justice Lodha said though we celebrate human rights day but in ground reality it is different.
“Should religion be a factor when two adults fell in love? People have been killed in cases of love jihad. The violators of human rights are not accountable to society. There is laxity in the police action. This question is shaking me every day,” he said.
Referring to the recent controversial film “Padmavati”, Ex-CJI said that movie is a creation of an artist but the film makers have been threatened, sets were destroyed. “Is it human rights which we are talking about when we have laws compatible to the international declaration of human rights?”
“In the name of cow protection, human beings were slaughtered. Cow vigilantes are mushrooming everywhere. Sedition charges are being invoked against activists. Cartoonists, actress and students were charged with sedition charges,” Justice Lodha said without taking any activists name.
“Do we really value human rights? Despite adequate laws, constitutional safeguards and strong judiciary, we are not able to achieve the goals of protection of human rights,” he said.
Pointing out that the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has become a toothless tiger and it has no true impact on achieving the human rights, Justice Lodha, who presided as President of the International Institute of Human Rights which has organized the function, urged for a robust mechanism to protect the human rights in the country.
Justice R K Agrawal, a sitting judge of Supreme Court, in his theme address on the issue of ‘Right to a Fair Trial and Due Process of Law’ said Constitution, apart from giving specific protections against retrospective criminalization, double jeopardy and self-incrimination, provides the accused with a right to fair trial under Article 21.
“India has adopted the Adversarial Criminal Justice Model which caters to public interest by punishing wrong doers and setting a deterring effect for the society at large. However, it works in favour of private interest by preventing wrongful conviction and protecting the life and liberty of the accused,” he said.
December 11, 2017 at 9:39 pm
What is creativity? When Sarat Chandra Chatterjee wrote at seventeen a great novel Devdas, it was creative. When it went on celluloid three times in Hindi and once in Telugu, we expected the movie will be loyal to the original. The Telugu version was very loyal to the original novel and stays till today as a classic movie of Indian cinema.All Hindi movies except the first one with Saigal were in my view flops. On seeing Aishwarya Roy’s Paru and Madhuri Dixit’s Chandramukhi, I felt like puking. The director claimed he was creative in making changes to the original. I don’t think so.He butchered Sarat’s great novel.
The same director now takes liberties with Padmavati story and shows a mass murderer Khilji as a romantic and a queen dancing. This is creativity to change history?
The Supreme Court in 1988 curbed individual freedom when they banned “The satanic Verses” on the comlaints of Muslims and the same year when they banned “The Last Temptation of Christ” on the complaints of Christians. Why did the SC do it? Now a former CJ is complaining about freedom of expression? In Telangana a crypto-Historian wrote a book denegrating Hinduism and when Hindus went to SC, They were dismissed on the pretext of freedom of expression. Did the writer of the novel and director of the movie not have freedom of expression in 1988? The Supreme Court showed clearly double standards and an anti-Hindu stance.
Now I know why SC of India is a big joke – they take sides on religions. It took them 30 years to discover freedom of expression? Or they were copying US model showing their intellectual bankruptcy?
They said Padmavati was not a real person. It looks as though Jesus and Mohammaed also were fictitious figures.
There is one law for Hindus and another for the other two as practised by the abominable SC.
December 12, 2017 at 4:30 pm
The Ex – CJI has rightly expressed his anguish over killings in the name of religion and cow protection. His opinion is valuable and must be understood in right spirit