Dubai: When Palestinian artist Ashraf Fayadh was tried last year on blasphemy-related charges, the Saudi judges overseeing the case rejected the prosecution’s request for a death sentence for apostasy. Instead, he was sentenced to 800 lashes and four years in prison over a book of poetry he wrote and for allegedly having illicit relations with women.
An appeal was filed and the case was sent back to the lower court, but this time around judges threw out defence witness testimony, refused to accept Mr Fayadh’s repentance and on November 17 sentenced him to execution for apostasy.
His friends are now asking how the case could draw such different verdicts, especially when, according to US-based Human Rights Watch, two of the three judges in the original case also served in the retrial.
The case illustrates how courts in Saudi Arabia can issue vastly different punishments based on how judges interpret Islamic law, a system derived from scholarly interpretations of the Koran and verified and documented rulings and sayings of the prophet Muhammad.
According to Human Rights Watch, which is closely monitoring the case, Mr Fayadh was charged with blasphemy, spreading atheism and having an illicit relationship with women, based on pictures found on his phone. He told the court the pictures were of women he had met at an art gallery.
A copy of the court’s ruling obtained by The Associated Press sheds some light into how judges came to issue the death sentence.
Mr Fayadh’s friends had submitted testimony disputing the veracity of a complaint filed to the religious police by an acquaintance who accused him of making blasphemous comments about God, the prophet Muhammad and the Saudi state during a heated discussion at a cafe in Abha, the south-western city where the case was heard.
The one-page court document says their testimony was not accepted in the retrial because the defendant’s own “admission is the strongest evidence”, without specifying what Mr Fayadh admitted to. He was arrested and released within a day for that argument in August 2013, Human Rights Watch says.
Just days earlier, Mr Fayadh’s friends say he may have caught the attention of religious police when he filmed one of them slapping a man on the face and forcibly pinning him against a wall in Abha. The video on YouTube has been viewed nearly 195,000 times.
While judges in the initial trial accepted Mr Fayadh’s repentance for anything deemed offensive to religion in his poetry book, judges in the retrial said the case was considered an instance of hadd – specific crimes, such as apostasy, that have fixed punishments in Islam.
Sharia is open to various interpretations, and many Muslim clerics say the death penalty is not the standard punishment for someone who leaves the faith or is an apostate, sourcing it to the prophet Muhammad’s pardon of a Muslim who had renounced Islam.
Saudi Arabia’s ultra-conservative teachings of Islam, known as Wahhabism, have drawn comparisons to some of the ideologies underpinning the Islamic State, which executes non-Muslims and Muslims alike for criticism of the faith. In Saudi Arabia, however, there are no known cases in recent years of executions for apostasy, though 152 people have been executed this year for crimes such as murder, rape and drug smuggling, according to Amnesty International.
Saudi sharia courts can issue discretionary judgments on a wide number of crimes, which also gives way to leniency. But in crimes of hadd, even the Saudi king cannot issue a pardon, though he can interject if there are questions around how the case was handled, according to Human Rights Watch researcher Adam Coogle, and Mr Fayadh’s friends who are familiar with the case.
In a separate case that drew widespread condemnation, including from Saudi Arabia’s closest Western allies, Saudi blogger Raif Badawi was publicly flogged 50 times this year and is serving a 10-year sentence for criticising the kingdom’s powerful religious establishment online.
The judges in Mr Fayadh’s retrial sentenced him to death after one hearing, whereas the first trial lasted six hearings, Mr Coogle said. Nowhere in the court’s second judgment did it state what Mr Fayadh said that was allegedly insulting to God and religion.
“It’s really up to the whim of judges in these cases,” Mr Coogle said.
Mr Fayadh’s brother-in-law, Osama Abu Raya, was quoted on the Saudi al-Watan news website this week describing the artist’s 2008 Arabic poetry book, Instructions Within, as a compilation of his thoughts as a young man. He said the book was not widely published. The court began assessing the book only last year after the man who filed the complaint against him also mentioned his poetry to the religious police. Then a fatwa council, which issues religious edicts, was asked to analyse it.
The 35-year-old had been better known for his role in the modern art world, curating an exhibition of Saudi artists at the 2013 Venice Biennale. He also curated a show in Saudi Arabia called Mostly Visible, which was visited by the director of London’s Tate Modern, Chris Dercon.
He produced Saudi artist Ahmed Matar‘s presentation, Word Into Art, at the British Museum in 2005.
Mr Matar said Mr Fayadh’s poetry book was about Palestinian issues. He said Mr Fayadh, who was born and raised in Abha, “is in a weak position” because he is Palestinian and does not have the backing of a powerful Saudi tribe to mediate. In a statement, the Palestinian Authority in the Israeli-occupied West Bank publicly appealed to Saudi Arabia to release him.
The Saudi government’s human rights body says it sent representatives to meet Mr Fayadh in prison in Abha, where he has been under arrest since January 2014.
Mr Fayadh’s case will likely be bumped back to the appeals court and then to the Supreme Court for a final ruling.
“He’s not an atheist. He is a Muslim artist and poet … He’s very sensitive, he’s very intelligent. He’s a very good friend to major artists,” said Stephen Stapleton, founding director of the London-based Edge of Arabia, which promotes Saudi artists.
“The reality of art is you’re going to have cases like this,” he added.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/in-saudi-arabia-artist-ashraf-fayadh-sentenced-to-death-for-atheism-20151125-gl88x9.html#ixzz3squ7WCU7
Fellow poets protest Saudi death sentence facing Ashraf Fayadh
Carol Ann Duffy, Paul Muldoon and Adonis among writers signing PEN letter calling on Saudi courts to free Palestinian poet convicted of apostasy, and to allow freedom of expression
Poets from around the world are lining up in solidarity with the Palestinian poet Ashraf Fayadh, with the Syrian poet Adonis, Ireland’s Paul Muldoon and Britain’s poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy among the signatories to a letter laying out how “appalled” they are at the death sentence he has been handed by Saudi Arabian authorities.
Fayadh was sentenced to death last week for renouncing Islam, a charge which he denies. Evidence used against him included poems from his collection Instructions Within, which is banned in Saudi Arabia, as well as his posts on Twitter, and a conversation he had in a coffee shop in Abha which was said to be blasphemous. He was given 30 days to appeal the sentence.
Today, PEN International published the latest salvo from an international arts community which has rallied behind him, with Muldoon, Duffy and Adonis joined as signatories to a letter attacking Saudi Arabia’s ruling by major names from the world of international poetry including the Serbian-American poet Charles Simić, the American John Ashbery, Palestinian Ghassan Zaqtan, Israeli Amir Or and the Hungarian-born George Szirtes.
“We, poets from around the world, are appalled that the Saudi Arabian authorities have sentenced Palestinian poet Ashraf Fayadh to death for apostasy,” they write, in a letter which PEN International hopes to deliver to the poet himself in an expression of solidarity. “It is not a crime to hold an idea, however unpopular, nor is it a crime to express opinion peacefully. Every individual has the freedom to believe or not believe. Freedom of conscience is an essential human freedom.”
The letter says that Fayadh’s death sentence “is the latest example of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s lack of tolerance for freedom of expression and ongoing persecution of free thinkers”, ending with a plea for the Palestinian’s release.
“We, Fayadh’s fellow poets, urge the Saudi authorities to desist from punishing individuals for the peaceful exercise of their right to freedom of expression and call for his immediate and unconditional release,” they write.
Speaking to the Guardian on Friday, Szirtes insisted that “opinions are not crimes”.
“Incitement can be a crime, hate speech may be a crime, but opinions are not,” he said. “That is precisely why organisations such as PEN exist. Any sentence for an individual opinion brings shame on Saudi Arabia: a death sentence brings maximum shame.”
According to Szirtes it is “incongruous for a country like ours to be allied with a country that makes decisions like this”.
“It runs counter to all our thoughts, habits and instincts, not just as poets or writers but as human beings,” he added. “Nor is it just a cultural matter: it is a matter of exactly that which we describe as universal human rights.”
The appeal follows the release of a joint statement signed by more than a dozen cultural and free speech organisations condemning the conviction of the Palestinian poet, including PEN International, which will be delivered to the Saudi embassy in London today by English PEN.
Last week, Fayadh told the Guardian that he was “really shocked” to receive his sentence “but it was expected, though I didn’t do anything that deserves death”.
“They accused me [of] atheism and spreading some destructive thoughts into society,” he said, describing his poetry collection as “just about me being [a] Palestinian refugee … about cultural and philosophical issues. But the religious extremists explained it as destructive ideas against God.”
Pen International pointed to extracts of Fayadh’s poems, translated by Mona Kareem. “it was said: settle there… / but some of you are enemies for all / so leave it now,” he writes in one. “look up to yourselves from the bottom of the river; / those of you on top should provide some pity for those underneath.”
The free speech organisation said that during his trial, the poet “expressed repentance for anything in the book that religious authorities may have deemed insulting”, and said, according to trial documents: “I am repentant to God most high and I am innocent of what appeared in my book mentioned in this case.”
On 25 November, the Guardian reported that, in a message to his supporters, Fayadh said he was “grateful for everyone working on my behalf”. “To be honest, I was surprised because I felt alone here. I am in good health. I’m struggling to follow all the developments. People should know I am not against anyone here, I am an artist and I am just looking for my freedom,” said the poet.
Leave a Reply