Dhananjay Mahapatra| TNN | U
HIGHLIGHTS
File photo of the Supreme Court of india
Amin was an accused in the Sohrabuddin encounter case. Given a clean chit by the trial court last year after being accused of disposing of the body of Sohrabuddin‘s wife, Kausarbi, in 2005, Amin retired as superintendent of police in August 2016 but was re-appointed SP of Mahisagar district by the Gujarat government for a period of one year. Barot, who was an accused in the Ishrat Jahan encountercase, was re-appointed as deputy SP with Western Railways in Vadodara for a year after his retirement. Both the cases were probed as “fake encounters”. On March 29, the Gujarat HC had dismissed a PIL filed by former IPS offi cer Rahul Sharma, who had challenged the one-year service extension to Amin and Barot -specialists in encounters -after their retirement.
While hearing Sharma’s appeal against the HC order, a bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud was requested by Amin’s counsel, Guru Krishnakumar, to permit his client to complete his tenure, which was to end on August 31.
But the bench of Justices Khehar and Chandrachud refused and said if the state did not accept Pandey’s resignation, it would pass appropriate orders. This forced the state to immediately accept Pandey’s resignation. Pandey was granted bail in 2015 and was reinstated in service.